Is DeepSeek R1 worth the premium? Our automated audit reveals a 68% cost difference in production environments.
"Major efficiency gain. Switching from DeepSeek R1 to Kimi Explorer 2 cuts costs by half (68%). Recommended for high-volume batch processing."
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 | Kimi Explorer 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M | ¥3.60 | ¥1.15 |
| Output / 1M | ¥14.40 | ¥2.30 |
| Cache Read | ¥0.36 | ¥0.06 |
| Context Window | 128K | 2M |
| Max Output | 32K | 8K |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Latency | TBD | TBD |
| Best Fit | Logic | File Analysis |
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 | Kimi Explorer 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M | ¥3.60 | ¥1.15 |
| Output / 1M | ¥14.40 | ¥2.30 |
| Cache Read | ¥0.36 | ¥0.06 |