2026 Audit Report

Gamma Pro vs Consensus

Is Gamma Pro worth the premium? Our automated audit reveals a 55% cost difference in production environments.

Last updated: Sep 22, 2026Sources: AxiomGrid Model Wiki · Provider pricing pagesQuality: MEDIUM

Axiom Verdict

"Major efficiency gain. Switching from Gamma Pro to Consensus cuts costs by half (55%). Recommended for high-volume batch processing."

Key Metrics

Axiom Snapshot
MetricGamma ProConsensus
Input / 1M￥3,000.00￥1,350.00
Output / 1M￥0.00￥0.00
Cache Read--
Context WindowContextContext
Max OutputPPTText
MultimodalYesNo
LatencyTBDTBD
Best FitSlidesScience

Action Plan

  • Migrate high-volume workloads to Consensus for immediate cost relief.
  • Keep Gamma Pro only for edge-case arbitration and premium reasoning.
  • Set a weekly cost audit to prevent pricing drift.

Methodology

  • Pricing is normalized to cost per 1M input/output tokens for direct comparison.
  • Arbitrage gap compares current input pricing against the higher-priced model.
  • Quality tier reflects pricing completeness, context window, and use-case coverage.

Pricing Matrix

MetricGamma ProConsensus
Input / 1M￥3,000.00￥1,350.00
Output / 1M￥0.00￥0.00
Cache Read￥0.00￥0.00

Use Case Analysis

Gamma Pro Wins
  • Slides
Consensus Wins
  • Science

FAQ

Which model is cheaper: Gamma Pro or Consensus?
Consensus shows a 55% cost advantage based on current input pricing.
When should I choose Gamma Pro?
Gamma Pro is best for Slides.
How does the context window compare?
Gamma Pro supports Context context vs Consensus at Context.
Which model is better for high-volume routing?
Consensus is the recommended L1/L2 router for cost efficiency.
Do cache discounts materially change costs?
Cache pricing is not published for at least one model; treat cache savings as unknown.
How often is this comparison updated?
This audit refreshes as model pricing changes. Last updated Sep 22, 2026.

Performance Radar

Gamma Pro
Consensus

Cost Scaling (Monthly)

Gamma Pro vs Consensus: 2026 Cost Audit | AxiomGrid